<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LawLawLandBlog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com</link>
	<description>Greenberg Glusker Entertainment Lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:57:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Stern Warning: Words Do Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/04/a-stern-warning-words-do-matter.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/04/a-stern-warning-words-do-matter.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Saivar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/?p=2077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it’s pretty clear that the legal world does not always jibe with the real world (and especially not The Real World: Cancun).  Take capitalization for instance.  In the real world, it doesn’t mean much.  In fact, based on what I’ve seen on Twitter and in hip wedding invitations, I believe the “art” of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/04/a-stern-warning-words-do-matter.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Spicy” Trademark Lawsuit of the Month</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/04/spicy-trademark-lawsuit-of-the-month.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/04/spicy-trademark-lawsuit-of-the-month.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nabel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/?p=2052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let’s play a game.  It’s called Guess-Who-the-Trademark-Owner-Is.  (I wanted to call it “Guess Who,” but didn’t want to risk confusing you with products/services of Hasbro or The Guess Who.)  Wait!  Don’t stop reading yet!  This will be fun.¹ Sort of.² Here is the game.  Imagine you walk into a supermarket to get some food for a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/04/spicy-trademark-lawsuit-of-the-month.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q&amp;A:  Can I Create a Film That&#8217;s &#8220;Inspired By&#8221; a Short Story Without Acquiring the Rights?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/03/qa-can-i-create-a-film-thats-inspired-by-a-short-story-without-acquiring-the-rights.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/03/qa-can-i-create-a-film-thats-inspired-by-a-short-story-without-acquiring-the-rights.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Galsor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film and Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idea Theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/?p=2043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q:  I was wondering if you could help me with a problem I am having with the rights to a short story.  I have been in touch with the relevant owners of the copyright and they have been told by the author’s estate they are not allowed to do anything with the rights to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/03/qa-can-i-create-a-film-thats-inspired-by-a-short-story-without-acquiring-the-rights.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Dogs on the Table, Please</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/03/no-dogs-on-the-table-please.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/03/no-dogs-on-the-table-please.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sofia Aguilar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/?p=2028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you’re like me, every once in a while, you see an adorable-looking dog and just say to yourself, “Oh dogs, gotta love ‘em.”  And, if you’re like me and live in Los Angeles, you occasionally follow that by saying to yourself, “What the…?!  Can that adorable-looking dog really be standing in the middle of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/03/no-dogs-on-the-table-please.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don Draper:  Modern-Day Criminal?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/03/don-draper-modern-day-criminal.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/03/don-draper-modern-day-criminal.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 21:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Wilkes Barchie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film and Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/?p=2023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blogger will be the first to admit that I may have a slight television addiction.  I’m routinely behind in my DVR watching (at least we’ve moved beyond the dark ages of the late 1990s when I had to record my then-favorite shows, Dawson’s Creek and Felicity, on VHS) and I sometimes find myself talking [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/03/don-draper-modern-day-criminal.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disney and Warner Bros. Duel on the Yellow Brick Road</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/03/disney-and-warner-bros-duel-on-the-yellow-brick-road.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/03/disney-and-warner-bros-duel-on-the-yellow-brick-road.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 22:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nabel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film and Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/?p=1999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago, Eriq Gardner of the Hollywood Reporter wrote an interesting article about Disney’s recent skirmishes with Warner Bros. concerning numerous Wizard of Oz-related trademark applications that both companies have filed. For Disney, the trademark applications pertain to its merchandising plans for the 2013 release of Oz, the Great and Powerful — “a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/03/disney-and-warner-bros-duel-on-the-yellow-brick-road.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How NBA Lawyers Can Save the NBA’s “No Star” Dunk Contest</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/02/how-nba-lawyers-can-save-the-nbas-no-star-dunk-contest.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/02/how-nba-lawyers-can-save-the-nbas-no-star-dunk-contest.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Bloom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/?p=1986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For most NBA basketball fans, the highlight of All-Star Weekend used to be the slam dunk contest.  Julius Erving (a.k.a. “Dr. J”) participated in, and won, the first dunk contest in 1976, electrifying the crowd with a dunk from just inside the free throw line.  Nobody had ever seen anything like it.  Other past dunk [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/02/how-nba-lawyers-can-save-the-nbas-no-star-dunk-contest.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Linsanity” Strikes the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/02/linsanity-strikes-the-u-s-patent-and-trademark-office.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/02/linsanity-strikes-the-u-s-patent-and-trademark-office.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nabel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Right of Publicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/?p=1971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I used to live in China, people liked to say, “Yao Ming lai le” (Yao Ming has arrived) whenever they saw my excessively tall frame lumbering towards them in a grocery store or crouching down beside them in a preposterously low-ceilinged subway car.  And I would smile, politely (usually while ducking my head under [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/02/linsanity-strikes-the-u-s-patent-and-trademark-office.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q&amp;A:  What Does This Indemnification Clause Actually Mean?</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/02/qa-what-does-this-indemnification-clause-actually-mean.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/02/qa-what-does-this-indemnification-clause-actually-mean.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Saivar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film and Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/?p=1948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q:  I’m a writer and just got an agreement with an “Indemnification” clause I see in all of my contracts but I’ve never really been sure what it means.  This one says:  “Writer shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Producer, and its licensees, successors and assigns… from and against all third party claims, damages, expenses, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/02/qa-what-does-this-indemnification-clause-actually-mean.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Beyoncé and Jay-Z’s “Blue Ivy Carter” Trademark Application Actually Makes Sense</title>
		<link>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/02/whybeyonce-and-jay-zs-blue-ivy-carter-trademark-application.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/02/whybeyonce-and-jay-zs-blue-ivy-carter-trademark-application.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 18:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Nabel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Talent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/?p=1958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last few weeks, many have commented about Beyoncé and Jay-Z’s decision to apply for trademark protection for the name of their newborn child — Blue Ivy Carter.  Many have observed that the move will protect Blue Ivy and the family from exploitation, while others have accused the celebrity couple of trying to cash [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawlawlandblog.com/2012/02/whybeyonce-and-jay-zs-blue-ivy-carter-trademark-application.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 860/1015 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.lawlawlandblog.com @ 2012-05-17 22:30:10 -->
